Newsroom image of kids

Child Watch® Column: "It’s Not Rocket Science"

Release Date: October 25, 2013

Marian Wright Edelman

“In the 1960s, when my grandfather was teaching me to drive in his little red Ford Falcon, there was an epidemic of deaths on the highways in the United States, and young people were dying in very large numbers.” That’s how Dr. Mark L. Rosenberg, president and CEO of The Task Force for Global Health, and former Assistant Surgeon General and former director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, recently began talking about today’s public health crisis for young people. He continued: “And this country said, ‘We can’t let this happen. We’re going to stop it,’ and they took $200 million and said, ‘We’re going to invest in research on how to stop young people from losing their lives on the highway,’ and they did an amazing, amazing thing. The research that they supported—and they started the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration—that research led to redesigning cars completely . . . The front end of the cars we drive today crush like an accordion to protect us. We have side-impact protection, rollover protection, air bags . . . We redesigned the roads…We’ve gotten drunk drivers, to a huge extent, off the roads…What we did in the ’60s, redesigning the car, redesigning the roadway, redesigning the drivers, was a result of scientific research, and as a result we have saved, between the ’60s and the beginning of this century, 325,000 lives. That’s the result of science.”

Dr. Rosenberg is confident that America can save lives being lost in the current epidemic of gun violence that is the second leading cause of death among children and teens ages 1 – 19 and the number one cause of death among Black children and teens. He believes this public health threat must be attacked just like all others—by using the power of science and evidence-based research: “We can apply the same science to firearm injuries and deaths of children, and it’s not rocket science.”

In Washington, D.C. on October 20th, the Children’s Defense Fund partnered with Washington National Cathedral for a special Children’s Sabbath service and activities, including a forum with leading experts on gun violence as a public health issue where Dr. Rosenberg shared his experience. Under his leadership the CDC conducted key research in the 1990s: “We set out to show that you could start a research program to find out how to prevent gun violence, just like you could reduce the number of fatalities on the roads, and I think one of the most striking findings from our research was designed to answer the question: Does having a gun in your home protect you, or does it put you and your family at risk?  Because the people who make and sell guns and the NRA [National Rifle Association] had a very strong vested interest in telling people, ‘You should get a gun and have it in your home for protection.’”

“So we tried to answer that question scientifically, and what we found was that not only did having a gun in your home not protect you, but it increased the risk that someone in your own home would be killed by a gun, not by 10 percent or 20 percent—that's how much of a risk you have to show to take a drug off the market; not by 100 percent or 200 percent, but 300 percent increase in the risk. And the risk that someone in your home would die from suicide with a gun—and I need to remind us that two-thirds of all gun deaths are suicides—the risk that someone in your home would die from gun suicide went up not 300 percent, but 500 percent. These were extraordinary findings that bringing a gun into your home increases the risk that someone in your home will die from a gun. . . . these research findings have been replicated again and again in many studies. So they’re not something that we question. This is the truth.”

This research was not well received by the gun lobby, and Dr. Rosenberg says they started a campaign to get rid of the whole gun violence prevention research agenda. The NRA successfully lobbied their allies in Congress to stop the CDC’s gun violence prevention research funding. As a result funding for gun violence prevention research at the CDC fell from an average of $2.5 million per year in 1993-1996 to half that in 1997-2000. Two decades later, the CDC is spending just $100,000 per year on gun violence prevention research. Meanwhile we are spending 2,500 times that amount on research to prevent traffic fatalities, even though traffic accidents and guns kill a similar number of people every year. We must not let this continue to happen. The President has requested that Congress authorize $10 million for gun violence prevention research at the CDC, and another $20 million to set up a nationwide system to better track gun deaths. This would still be only a tenth of what we are spending on traffic deaths, but it would be a vast improvement over where we are right now.

Dr. Rosenberg also said: “There’s this sense of fatalism that people sometimes have, and you say, ‘Oh, there’s 300 million guns out there in the country. The problem is so big, there is nothing we can do about it, and besides, we’ve lived with violence from the beginnings of mankind. It’s just out there’. . . But we’ve learned that violence is not ‘just evil,’ but violence is specific types of problems: child abuse, child neglect, dating violence, youth violence, intimate partner violence and gender-based violence, rape and sexual assault, child sexual abuse, elder abuse, suicide. Violence is a set of specific problems, and we can apply these same four questions—What’s the problem? What are the causes? What works? And how do you do it?—to each of these types, and they can be prevented.”

Our nation’s gun violence epidemic is not inevitable. Scholars must be allowed to do the desperately needed scientific research that will help parents, policymakers and the public determine how we can all work together to stop it. The NRA cannot be allowed to continue to block the truth at the cost of so many lives.  

Marian Wright Edelman is President of the Children's Defense Fund whose Leave No Child Behind® mission is to ensure every child a Healthy Start, a Head Start, a Fair Start, a Safe Start and a Moral Start in life and successful passage to adulthood with the help of caring families and communities. For more information go to

Mrs. Edelman's Child Watch Column also appears each week on The Huffington Post.

Sign-up to receive CDF President Marian Wright Edelman's weekly Child Watch Column.

Let us know what you think about this column:

Enter this word: Change

Here's what others have said:

Submitted by hconyers at: October 30, 2013
thank you - we cannot be silent

Submitted by Akbar at: October 29, 2013
But we’ve learned that violence is not ‘just evil,’ but violence is specific types of problems: child abuse, child neglect, dating violence, youth violence, intimate partner violence and gender-based violence, rape and sexual assault, child sexual abuse, elder abuse, suicide. Violence is a set of specific problems, and we can apply these same four questions—What’s the problem? What are the causes? What works? And how do you do it?—to each of these types, and they can be prevented.” - See more at:

Submitted by Edwin at: October 28, 2013
Thank you for bringing "all the facts" into clear focus. Armed with the facts and pointing to a clear strategy for gun violence prevention, is the rational approach that must be placed at the forefront of the legislative agenda.

Submitted by greyfox at: October 28, 2013
Yes, I agree 100% with your article. It should be published in our churches and with our young folks organizations.

Submitted by edare at: October 28, 2013
Who are we? Are we still a country that values life above all else? I think not. We are puppets watching and feeling the Kock Bros, NRA, Citizens United tie the strings to our hands, and knees. We do have our voices.

Submitted by mountain-top at: October 27, 2013
How many more violent tragedies need to occur before we have sufficient political will to override the NRA and address this issue with evidence-based policy?

Submitted by CANTWAIT at: October 27, 2013
Thank you Marian...keep our children's safety at the forefront.

Submitted by Chris at: October 27, 2013
Thanks for all your efforts to educate us!

Submitted by Al at: October 26, 2013
Very well written article. Really like the positive tone of it.

Submitted by Allenvestal at: October 26, 2013
Nearly impossible to buy a gun legally in Mexico and half the adults in Switzerland have fully automatic rifles. Where are you safer? I understand the frustration with violence I do not understand simplistic kindergartner level solutions that do not work.

Submitted by AllenV at: October 26, 2013
It is nearly impossible to obtain a gun legally in Mexico and half the population of the adults in Switzerland have fully automatic military weapons. Which country do you feel safer in? I understand frustrion with crime I do not understand kindergarten level solutions that do not work.

Submitted by baba at: October 26, 2013
Your newsletters are the most inspiring material .

Submitted by mskarannla at: October 26, 2013
Instead of spending billions of dollars to find superficial reasons for the violence in our country why not get to the root cause? We have shown our children that they are a choice and no one, including the president, is responsible for anything. Where no morals exist, no values exist and therefore anything goes. When people start accepting responsibility for their behavior then we will see a change. So step up to the plate and accept your responsibility for what you have done. Parents starting parenting, teachers start teaching and society accept the fact that not everything is acceptable!

Submitted by RandallS at: October 26, 2013
Just the gun shootings of /by kids this year alone is depressing. It wasn't like that when I was a kid growing up in Wisconsin in the 1960s. But hat's more depressing is the nation's inability to forge a solution to this public health problem. What I am not hearing in the polemic of gun violence is that this is really a chronic public health issue. It seems to be framed simply as a freedom to have a gun issue. This is why we are stuck in quicksand and sinking. The NRA and its ilk has forced its side of the argument: 2nd amendment rights and freedom to have a gun. But the effect is more guns has created more violence and this violence is no different from the flu pandemic of 1918 where freedoms were curtailed for public health purposes. I really think we need a massive public ad campaign to reframe the issue as More Guns are a Contagious Disease.

Submitted by pollyjoy at: October 26, 2013
I agree with asking the four questions, and doing the research necessary to find the answers...what kind of country are we turning into when someone says that we need a gun to feel safe and secure in our homes.

Submitted by Lisa at: October 25, 2013
This article should be on Facebook and You Tube. More people need to know these facts. This article scares the hell out of me. Thank you for enlightening me.

Submitted by Anonymous at: October 25, 2013
Thank you for an informative article. We must stand up to the NRA.

Submitted by Maggie at: October 25, 2013
It is not rocket science. Let's do it!

Submitted by mm at: October 25, 2013
It is my belief that the second amendment was to enable the militias to defend us in any instance that we were invaded by foreign armies, and that the police and military forces should be the only ones that are legally armed. Provisions should be made to enable hunters to seek their prey, but there should be limitations in the hunting licenses as ell.

Submitted by Alice at: October 25, 2013
Powerful and practical information and ideas. Thank you, CDF!